The Pendleton Civil Service Act Was Meant To Stop Which Of These Activities?
From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
| The Administrative Land Projection |
|---|
 |
| Five Pillars of the Administrative State |
| • Nondelegation • Judicial deference • Executive control • Procedural rights • Agency dynamics |
| Click here for more coverage of the authoritative state on Ballotpedia |
The Pendleton Act is a federal law passed in 1883 reforming the ceremonious service and establishing the Usa Civil Service Committee. It ended the spoils organization of political patronage and established competitive examinations for hiring civil servants.[i]
Background
The election of Andrew Jackson in 1828 established the spoils system, in which federal civil service jobs went to political supporters, political party members, family unit, and friends of the winning administration. Following the assassination of President James Garfield in 1881 by a disgruntled task-seeker, public support grew for civil service reform. The new President, Chester Arthur, who had been Garfield'due south Vice-President, signed the Pendleton Act into law in 1883.[2]
Provisions
U.s. Civil Service Commission
The act established the United States Ceremonious Service Committee equally a nonpartisan federal agency to oversee the hiring of federal civil servants. The commission consisted of three members appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, non more two of whom could be members of the same political party.[1]
The primary duty of the Commission was to create and administer standardized competency examinations for civil service job candidates. The Commission as well appointed a Primary Examiner to coordinate the activities of state and territorial examination boards, which were modeled subsequently the federal commission. Finally, the deed authorized the federal commission to promulgate rules and regulations for the performance of its duties, which were to be published in an annual report to the President and Congress (rulemaking was not fully standardized and centralized until the passage of the Administrative Procedure Deed, after which all regulations were published in the Federal Register).[1]
Ban on Patronage
The act took several steps to eliminate political patronage in the civil service. As well requiring exams, it as well instructed the Commission to apportion civil service appointments among the states and territories according to their population. Whatsoever examiner who unfairly aided or injured a candidate's chances, or contradistinct the results of an exam, would be establish guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to fines or imprisonment. No Senator or Representative could brand a recommendation to rent a candidate, they could simply offer character references. Finally, the deed held that only 2 members of the aforementioned could serve in the civil service at the aforementioned time.[1]
Ban on Political Activity by Civil Servants
The deed prohibited civil servants from using federal money or buildings for political purposes. It likewise banned them from coercing a subordinate to make any sort of political donation or action. Section 14 of the act issued a blanket ban on payments past ceremonious servants to other ceremonious servants to obtain political favors.
| " | That no officer, clerk, or other person in the service of the United states of america shall, directly or indirectly, requite or hand over to whatsoever other officer, clerk, or person in the service of the U.s.a....any coin or other valuable matter on business relationship of or to be applied to the promotion of any political object whatever.[1] [3] | " |
Alteration statutes
Beneath is a partial list of subsequent laws that amended provisions of the Pendleton Act:
- Civil Service Reform Act abolished the United States Civil Service Commission and replaced it with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Merit Systems Protection Board, and Federal Labor Relations Authority.
See besides
- Civil Service Reform Act
- United States Civil Service Commission
- Authoritative land
External links
- Full text of the act
- Search Google News for this topic
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 i.2 i.3 ane.iv OurDocuments.gov, "Pendleton Act (1883)," accessed January 3, 2018
- ↑ OurDocuments.gov, "Pendleton Act (1883)," accessed January three, 2018
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Whatever inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
| The Authoritative State Project | ||
|---|---|---|
| Main | The Administrative State Project main folio • Administrative State Projection Index • Glossary of administrative state terms • Quotes about the administrative land • Administrative state • Rulemaking • Deference • Adjudication • Nondelegation doctrine |  |
| Reporting | Changes to the Federal Annals • Completed OIRA review of federal administrative agency rules • Federal agency rules repealed under the Congressional Review Act • Historical additions to the Federal Annals, 1936-2016 • Pages added monthly to the Federal Register, 1995-2017 | |
| Laws | Administrative Procedure Act • Antiquities Act • Civil Service Reform Deed • Clayton Antitrust Act • Communications Human action of 1934 • Congressional Review Act • Electronic Freedom of Information Act • Federal Nutrient, Drug, and Corrective Act of 1938 • Federal Housekeeping Statute • Federal Reserve Act • Federal Trade Committee Act of 1914 • Liberty of Information Act • Government in the Sunshine Human activity • Independent Offices Appropriations Human action of 1952 • Data Quality Deed • Interstate Commerce Human activity • National Labor Relations Act • Paperwork Reduction Human action • Pendleton Human activity • Privacy Deed of 1974 • Regulatory Flexibility Human action • REINS Human action • REINS Human activity (Wisconsin) • Securities Human action of 1933 • Securities Exchange Act of 1934 • Sherman Antitrust Act • Pocket-sized Business organization Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act • Truth in Regulating Act • Unfunded Mandates Reform Act | |
| Cases | Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner • A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States • Association of Information Processing Service Organizations v. Military camp • Auer v. Robbins • Chevron 5. Natural Resources Defense Council • Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe • Federal Trade Commission (FTC) v. Standard Oil Visitor of California • Field five. Clark • Nutrient and Drug Administration v. Chocolate-brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation • Humphrey'south Executor v. U.s. • Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) five. Chadha • J.W. Hampton Jr. & Visitor v. United States • Lucia v. SEC • Marshall v. Barlow's • Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Bureau • Mistretta v. U.s. • National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. Sebelius • National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning Company • National Labor Relations Board 5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. • Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan • Securities and Commutation Commission v. Chenery Corporation • Skidmore v. Swift & Co. • Usa v. Lopez • United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co. • Universal Camera Corporation five. National Labor Relations Board • Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resource Defense force Quango • Wayman 5. Southard • Weyerhaeuser Company v. United states Fish and Wildlife Service • Whitman v. American Trucking Associations • Wickard v. Filburn • Wiener v. United states | |
| Terms | Adjudication (administrative state) • Authoritative judge • Authoritative law • Administrative police force gauge • Authoritative state • Arbitrary-or-capricious test • Auer deference • Barrier to entry • Bootleggers and Baptists • Chevron deference (doctrine) • Civil servant • Civil service • Code of Federal Regulations • Codify (administrative state) • Annotate period • Compliance costs • Congressional Tape • Coordination (administrative state) • Deference (administrative land) • Direct and indirect costs (authoritative state) • Enabling statute • Ex parte communication (administrative state) • Executive agency • Federal law • Federal Register • Federalism • Last rule • Formal rulemaking • Formalism (law) • Functionalism (law) • Guidance (administrative country) • Hybrid rulemaking • Incorporation past reference • Independent federal agency • Informal rulemaking • Articulation resolution of disapproval (authoritative state) • Major rule • Negotiated rulemaking • Nondelegation doctrine • OIRA prompt letter of the alphabet • Organic statute • Pragmatism (law) • Precautionary principle • Promulgate • Proposed dominion • Publication rulemaking • Regulatory budget • Regulatory capture • Regulatory dark thing • Regulatory touch on analysis • Regulatory policy officer • Regulatory reform officer • Regulatory review • Hire seeking • Retrospective regulatory review • Risk cess (administrative state) • Rulemaking • Separation of powers • Significant regulatory activity • Skidmore deference • Statutory authorisation • Noun police and procedural law • Sue and settle • Dusk provision • Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions • United states Code • Us Statutes at Large | |
| Bibliography | | |
| Agencies | Administrative Briefing of the The states • U.s. Civil Service Commission • U.S. Government Accountability Office • U.Due south. Function of Information and Regulatory Affairs • U.S. Part of Management and Budget | |
| Ballotpedia | |
|---|---|
| About | Overview • What people are proverb • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities |
| Executive: Leslie Graves, President • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officer • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy Communications: Alison Graves • Megan Brown • Abigail Campbell • Sarah Groat • Lauren Nemerovski Contributors: Scott Rasmussen | |
| Editorial | Geoff Pallay, Editor-in-Chief • Daniel Anderson, Managing Editor • Ryan Byrne, Managing Editor • Cory Eucalitto, Managing Editor • Mandy Gillip, Managing Editor • Jerrick Adams • Victoria Antram • Dave Beaudoin • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Kate Carsella • Kelly Coyle • Megan Feeney • Nicole Fisher • Juan García de Paredes • Sara Horton • Tyler King • Doug Kronaizl • Amee LaTour • David Luchs • Brittony Maag • Roneka Matheny • Andrew McNair • Jackie Mitchell • Elisabeth Moore • Ellen Morrissey • Mackenzie White potato • Samantha Post • Paul Rader • Ethan Rice • Myj Saintyl • Maddie Sinclair Johnson • Abbey Smith • Janie Valentine • Caitlin Vanden Boom • Joel Williams • Samuel Wonacott • Mercedes Yanora |
The Pendleton Civil Service Act Was Meant To Stop Which Of These Activities?,
Source: https://ballotpedia.org/Pendleton_Act
Posted by: ramirezdecterral52.blogspot.com
0 Response to "The Pendleton Civil Service Act Was Meant To Stop Which Of These Activities?"
Post a Comment